<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fabrizio Lungo&#039;s Blog &#187; Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fabrizio.me.uk/tag/test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fabrizio.me.uk</link>
	<description>The official blog of Fabrizio Lungo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Testing moBlog</title>
		<link>http://fabrizio.me.uk/2010/02/testing-moblog/</link>
		<comments>http://fabrizio.me.uk/2010/02/testing-moblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabrizio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (This Site)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fabrizio.me.uk/2010/02/testing-moblog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is designed as a way for me to test moBlog on my mobile. moBlog is a Windows Mobile program that allows you to blog remotely from your mobile. It is quite easy to set up and works with a variety of blogging services and allow you to have multiple profiles and muntiple blogs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>This post is designed as a way for me to test moBlog on my mobile. moBlog is a Windows Mobile program that allows you to blog remotely from your mobile. It is quite easy to set up and works with a variety of blogging services and allow you to have multiple profiles and muntiple blogs set up simultaniously!</p>
<p>The interface for writing blogs is in HTML but has a preview option to view the blog before uploading. The writing sceen is very simple and is literally a large text box but you do have limited formatting features which just allow you to insert the appropriate HTML tags for whatever formatting you want!</p>
<p>Examples of the formatting avaiable:</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Bold</b></li>
<li><i>Italic</i></li>
<li><u>Underline</u></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Note: </b>Bullet points are not avaiable but I know the HTML for them and using custom HTML tags seems to work even on the preview.</p>
<p>The last feature provided when writing a blog is the ability to insert pictures. If this works you should see a stock photo from my HTC Touch Pro bellow:<br />
<img src='http://fabrizio.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Album-Sample_05.jpg' /></p>
<p>As a basic bloging programme, this is acceptable but there are some major flaws which make the program difficult to work with! My main issue is when you try to write a blog or use the software in landscape. Th way the screen reorganises is impractical and require lots of scrolling to navigate. Rather than resizing the input and preview boxes to a 480 x 640 screen, it simply adjusts the width for 640 keeping the height as it is when in portrait mode. This result in the software being appropriate for a 640 x 640 screen and since this does not fit on the screen, a second scroll bar is added so that you can navigate the larger area. So that this makes more sense I will upload some screenshots late <img src='http://fabrizio.me.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Although the formatting options are limited they are much greater than those offered by my alternative which is by using the browser and full sized WP admin panel. The advantage of using the WP admin panel is that although the WYSIWYG does not work in Opera Mobile 10, it is better than the preview in moBlogs as it shows a more precise representation of what the output will actually looks like! For example, in WordPress, I have notice that using line breaks in the HTML view results in a line break in the output however the preview in moBlog does not acount for this.</p>
<p>Another disadvantage of moBlog is that it is not very user friendly. It uses a basic Windows CE design and is not as asthetically pleasing as using the online interface.</p>
<p>Overall I would not recomend moBlog forf the mobile blogger as it just doesn&#8217;t provide all the nessasary features required by a blogger today.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-588"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fabrizio.me.uk/2010/02/testing-moblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Test: Mozilla Firefox VS. Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://fabrizio.me.uk/2009/09/quick-test-mozilla-firefox-vs-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://fabrizio.me.uk/2009/09/quick-test-mozilla-firefox-vs-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabrizio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speed Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunSpider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fabrizio.me.uk/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just a quick little blog post to get me back into my blogging. I just did a test using SunSpider on an (admitedly) not very powerful computer and got some interesting results! Both Firefox and Chrome were tested on the same computer to make it fair and just look how much faster Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>This is just a quick little blog post to get me back into my blogging. I just did a test using SunSpider on an (admitedly) not very powerful computer and got some interesting results! Both Firefox and Chrome were tested on the same computer to make it fair and just look how much faster Google Chrome was!</p>
<div id="attachment_154" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 522px"><a href="http://fabrizio.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Firefox-Vs-Chrome.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-154" title="Firefox Vs Chrome" src="http://fabrizio.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Firefox-Vs-Chrome-512x454.png" alt="SunSpider JavaScript benchmark result comparison from Mozilla Firefox to Google Chrome." width="512" height="454" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">SunSpider JavaScript benchmark result comparison from Mozilla Firefox to Google Chrome. Click to view in full size!</p></div>
<p>It was overall, 6.22 times faster than Mozilla Firefox! This shows that Google has gone to allot of effort to increase the speed at which JS is handled. For a more in-depth look at my results, here are the links to each:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Mozilla Firefox SunSpider JS Benchmark Results" href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?{%223d-cube%22:[245,236,227,235,220],%223d-morph%22:[213,205,201,462,370],%223d-raytrace%22:[207,200,203,454,246],%22access-binary-trees%22:[73,69,68,68,72],%22access-fannkuch%22:[375,356,375,584,369],%22access-nbody%22:[302,287,272,259,273],%22access-nsieve%22:[90,143,93,88,98],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[118,105,108,120,107],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[147,133,137,149,134],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[104,91,109,93,92],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[171,167,164,220,221],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[69,64,68,62,67],%22crypto-aes%22:[125,117,122,137,118],%22crypto-md5%22:[111,102,102,120,105],%22crypto-sha1%22:[107,105,106,125,147],%22date-format-tofte%22:[284,258,273,388,273],%22date-format-xparb%22:[180,176,188,208,177],%22math-cordic%22:[298,282,371,285,288],%22math-partial-sums%22:[195,191,219,199,186],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[138,120,125,121,128],%22regexp-dna%22:[293,278,277,356,411],%22string-base64%22:[130,125,125,133,125],%22string-fasta%22:[260,253,244,260,259],%22string-tagcloud%22:[210,216,300,202,291],%22string-unpack-code%22:[422,452,476,472,450],%22string-validate-input%22:[167,159,175,162,173]}" target="_blank">Mozilla Firefox</a></li>
<li><a title="Google Chrome SunSpider JS Benchmark Results" href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?{%223d-cube%22:[41,38,43,44,40],%223d-morph%22:[53,42,40,47,40],%223d-raytrace%22:[47,44,47,49,41],%22access-binary-trees%22:[4,4,4,4,5],%22access-fannkuch%22:[22,20,20,21,19],%22access-nbody%22:[30,32,28,30,29],%22access-nsieve%22:[7,6,6,6,6],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[4,4,4,4,4],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[10,12,10,11,12],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[17,17,16,16,16],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[27,24,26,27,25],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[3,4,4,4,5],%22crypto-aes%22:[27,17,19,19,21],%22crypto-md5%22:[17,15,15,17,15],%22crypto-sha1%22:[16,15,14,14,14],%22date-format-tofte%22:[52,49,48,49,56],%22date-format-xparb%22:[74,53,55,56,60],%22math-cordic%22:[29,26,31,30,28],%22math-partial-sums%22:[42,38,38,40,41],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[17,16,16,17,15],%22regexp-dna%22:[212,21,26,21,22],%22string-base64%22:[31,28,31,33,30],%22string-fasta%22:[40,40,40,40,39],%22string-tagcloud%22:[76,59,57,76,58],%22string-unpack-code%22:[106,96,91,95,96],%22string-validate-input%22:[81,50,56,50,50]}" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a></li>
</ul>
<p>I will be posting some more tests that I run in the near future to see if I get the same results on different computers and then do a full analysis of my results! Watch this space&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh and if you want to get Google Chrome after seeing these results, you can download it <a title="Google Chrome Download" href="http://www.google.co.uk/chrome" target="_blank">here</a> and if you like BETA versions click <a title="Google Chrome BETA Download" href="http://www.google.com/landing/chrome/beta/">here</a>!</p>
<p>[cb type="product"]FireFox[/cb] [cb type="product"]Google Chrome[/cb]</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-153"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fabrizio.me.uk/2009/09/quick-test-mozilla-firefox-vs-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

